Anti — Gay Marriage Argument No. It is this kind of love that is recognised through marriage. Marriage exists to make men and women responsible to each other and to any children that they might have. This is not, however, a question of equality. This relates to a problem in almost all sociological research involving the isolation of variables. Certainly not the lawyers for the conservatives. Premise 2 is also clearly false, as stated.
My point is, the crowd that whines about the damage that it says would be brought on the institution of marriage if gays were allowed to wed is a bunch of lying hypocrites.
The Failed Logic of Secular Arguments Against Gay Marriage
The latter are intrinsically barren and hence cannot be life giving. In terms of the truth of it follows that if  and  are true then so will . It is not sound if any of the premises are false, since the conclusion will not be true. And, like all in the anti-gay-marriage crowd, Anderson spends precious little time on what really threatens marriages—divorce. It is clear that this involves having the same kinds of essential characteristics. Based on his argument, widows and widowers are somehow destructive to children—after all, why would one man raising a child be fine, while two men would be destructive? Likewise, there is no injustice in recognising that a homosexual union can be a committed one in much the same way as a heterosexual one without proposing that there is injustice in treating one relationship as different from the other.
As we have already argued, a heterosexual union is of the kind which is normally open to the advent of children through the procreative act, in order to form a family. It follows that such unions are not the same as marriage and the question of equal treatment does not arise. Based on his argument, widows and widowers are somehow destructive to children—after all, why would one man raising a child be fine, while two men would be destructive? This premise is false. Here are the main issues the justices would have to evaluate if they agree to rule on the gay marriage debate:.